Note: EMGR has moved to its own domain name. This site will remain online (but with closed comments) until roughly July 1, 2007. Please update your bookmarks to visit EMGR at its new location: eriemediablog.com.

Wednesday, November 08, 2006

Erie Is Not The Only Market To Deal With Journalistic Ethics!

Guess What? VJ Was Not Involved.

(Editor’s Note: Thanks again to an EMGR reader; we have another example of how things that can go wrong. This one is also close to home. The following was a commentary published in the Pittsburgh Post-Gazette. I am sure they enjoyed doing their own “gotcha story” on their broadcast brother. Thanks again to the poster for pointing it our way. If anyone else has any posting ideas or has seen something that would interest EMGR readers, send them to emgr@verizon.net. All confidential and no Poster's names will be used. )

Tuned In: After suicide, stations should rethink 'gotcha stories'

Monday, November 06, 2006
By Rob Owen, Pittsburgh Post-Gazette

The "sweeps" months, when local TV news promotions and "special reports" are at their most over-the-top, have become a routine annoyance to discerning television viewers. Less than a week into the current November sweeps period, they've taken a tragic turn.

The Rev. Brent Dugan, pastor of Community Presbyterian Church of Ben Avon, committed suicide last week after KDKA-TV aired a series of promotions for a Marty Griffin report that suggested Dugan was involved in illicit behavior.

Some viewers sent me understandably emotional e-mails that were as hyperbolic as the TV news promos they decry (one subject line: "KDKA's Assassination of Ben Avon Pastor"). That goes too far. It was Dugan's choice to overdose on aspirin and alcohol in a Mercer County motel.

But this tragic outcome ought to make reporters and news directors in all newsrooms, particularly KDKA management and Griffin, take a contemplative look at the impact salacious, fear-mongering sweeps-month promos and reports can have.

TV news has an obligation to uncover wrongdoing, but too often stations appear to be more excited about reporting stories that bring themselves attention. Were the accusations in Griffin's investigation true? Did the report merit airing? There's no way of knowing because the story never aired.

KDKA general manager Chris Pike said the station would have no comment beyond a statement released Friday night that expressed condolences to Dugan's family and friends and explained that KDKA had "conducted a monthlong investigation into reports of public and illegal sexual behavior by Pastor Dugan. The results of that investigation were scheduled to air [Thursday] evening. ... That evening the station received information from someone close to Pastor Dugan that indicated that he was considering doing harm to himself. As a result, the station made the decision not to air the story."

News director John Verrilli would not say whether Griffin's story will air; on Friday afternoon Pike said it was unlikely to air. Griffin did not respond to a message on his work voice mail seeking comment.

Promos for the report were broadcast for several days last week. They showed Griffin confronting Dugan about his alleged visits to an adult bookstore. It was unclear from the promos what other details the report would reveal.
During the 11 p.m. news Thursday, Griffin said his investigation "uncovered illicit, possibly illegal, activity by a local minister, activities which, at the very least, violated the rules of his denomination."

It's the use of key words -- possibly illegal, at the very least -- that call into question whether the report was worth doing in the first place. If the best Griffin could dig up was a trip to an adult bookstore (not illegal) and violation of church rules, then there's not much in it to serve the public interest. It comes off looking like another "gotcha"-style story designed for no benefit except the TV station's ratings.

What aired Thursday did not mention Dugan by name; he wasn't shown on screen. His church and denomination were not named. But Dugan was pictured in promos that aired for several days earlier on KDKA. The damage was done.

Even if you give station management the benefit of the doubt that they were unaware of Dugan's threat to himself when they chose to air the promos, you have to ask, do TV station promos for stories of wrongdoing have to be so licking-their-chops sensational? They're designed to lure viewers, but clearly they can have unintended consequences as well.

The possibility of the harm they can cause -- not only to the person under investigation, but to his family and community -- needs to be considered. (It should be noted, someone could just as easily be provoked by newspaper stories, but, tabloids aside, you don't usually see the print media stoop to scare tactics to promote upcoming reports.)

And why did KDKA air the promos and Thursday night's non-report and choose not to cover Dugan's suicide? Verrilli wouldn't comment on that, either.

For Griffin, provocative reporting is nothing new. During last November's sweeps -- a four-week period during which Nielsen Media Research measures viewership so stations can set advertising rates -- Griffin ventured onto Port Authority property while reporting on lax security at a bus garage. He was eventually found not guilty of trespassing on appeal.
Griffin worked at KXAS-TV in Dallas in the 1990s, when he reported on sexual assault allegations against two Dallas Cowboy football players by a former topless dancer. She later recanted, according to a 1997 Dallas Morning News report, and the players sued KXAS and Griffin. The station settled with the players for $2.2 million, according to the Dallas paper. Griffin's attorney told the paper that the reporter admitted no wrongdoing as part of the settlement.

One would hope the death of a human being would cause station management and staff to re-evaluate the way they cover and promote news, particularly sweeps- month features. Disgusted viewers may choose not to watch KDKA, but there's a problem with that approach: The lower that stations' ratings go, the more desperate for attention they tend to get and the greater the lengths they'll try. (Remember the tawdry tone of WPXI's newscasts when they were a perennial third place?)

With a thirst for profit driving media conglomerates' news coverage, this sort of thing could happen again. That may be the greatest tragedy of all.

"Congress passed a law on February 1, 2006, setting a final deadline for the DTV transition of February 17, 2009. Most television stations will continue broadcasting both analog and digital programming until February 17, 2009, when all analog broadcasting will stop.." FCC http://www.dtv.gov/

Thursday... VJ? Or Is it Really CJ?

17 comments:

Anonymous said...

It is nice to see a newspaper hold a TV stations' feet to the fire when they screw up.

Unfortunately, this happened in Pittsburgh.

Whenever a TV station screws up in Erie the newspaper gives them a free pass.

Thank goodness for all the bloggers who complained a couple weeks ago when WSEE (and you-know-who?) reported the identity of a suicide victim.

I guess it is up to individuals (not the Erie Newspaper) to continue to hold the Broadcast Media accountable for its' actions.

Anonymous said...

Anyone watch WICU's Election coverage last night at 11pm?

I don't know why I keep watching Channel 12? They had SOOOO MANY mistakes I lost track of counting them all.

Trying to go to reporters not ready, going to the newsroom and not be ready, wrong numbers, technical goofs and gaffs.....

I guess it was just a typical WICU newscast!?

Coverage You Can Count On (???)...Just a hollow slogan that has no meaning whatsoever!

Anonymous said...

Elections happen every couple of years. The local stations know this, yet they continually screw up, have the wrong numbers and generally can't put on a decent election night newscast.

What could the excuse be? Do the news directors wake up on election day and exclaim "holy ****! We need to cover this!!??"

If you aren't going to care then don't even bother to promote a "special" newscast!

I realize mistakes do happen - yet when they happen every election newscast every few years - then something is very wrong!

Just tell me what the ACCURATE numbers are and forget all the bells and whistles!

Anonymous said...

Who was it that did that awful story at WSEE? Wasn't it Scott Bremner?

Anonymous said...

Yes, it was Scott "Mr. Awful Story" Bremner!

Anonymous said...

Did anyone notice Kevin MacDowell was waving his arms like an out-of-control Eagle last night?? Maybe they should just strap his arms to his body and have the camera shoot him from the neck up?? Seriously, (and I apologize if you think this is a REALLY cheap shot...it isn't - just concern!) (Edit: Yes it was a cheap shot.) I also notice on his biography the amount of large market's he has worked in. Why is he in Market 142? I guess he just isn't that good? Commanding presence? PLEASE! My Cat has more of a commanding presence! I can see it now..."This is Channel 12 news and now, FLUFFY THE CAT WITH THE NEWS!!" LOL!!!!!!

Anonymous said...

OK. I deserved that edit. I wasn't trying to be disrespectful.


+++ Personal Apology +++
I had a family member that had that problem and I just notice the similarities between the two.

Anonymous said...

How did this posting go from the trouble in Pittsburgh to WICU's Election Night problems?

I might as well pile on along with the others.

12's Election Night coverage was terrible! Just terrible!

They need to get people in there that actually care about on air mistakes.

It was a little nasty to say that Kevin needed to be strapped down but the truth can hurt.

He moves around waaaay to much on air. I get motion sickness watching him deliver the news.

Jack Tirak said...

Since a large volume of readers of EMGR come from our stations, I am sure they get the message about the coverage. I have a feeling that postmortims are being done as we write.

Anonymous said...

Can we have the funeral for WICU's Election Coverage at Erie Cemetary?

I guess you can send memorials to the WSEE Save The Station Fund!!!!

Anonymous said...

This is off the mark but I was watching the WSEE news at 6pm tonight.

At the end of the newscast when they went to tape (with Newswatch and copyright logos) the audio operator forgot to turn off their mikes.

I don't want to say who I thought said the "F" word but someone said the "F" word!

The person was laughing and said "F It!"

I have it on TiVo and I am going to complain to the FCC.

The "F" word is a No No on TV!

Jack Tirak said...

On Scott Bremner...

Scott was the only real man at WSEE that day a few weeks ago. At least he wrote about the decision. You may not agree with him or the stations decision, but at least he was a man to stand up and speak.

I not only like that I respect that. Management hid behind his hate and said nothing. Nor did the newspaper. I agree that the newspaper should have been the one to speak on this as well.

That is only one why this blog exists. To allow everyone...even if you don't agree with the majority or with me, to speak their mind and opinion.

Anonymous said...

Since the discussion threads have been getting all jumbled up betweenthe different topics, I'm going to post this here (Jack, feel free to move it to another place on your blog).

For those Erie area viewers interested in trying to get CBS network programming in HD via satellite, and having trouble with WSEE granting the waiver, take a look at

http://www.tech-notes.tv/

Click on the link for "Current Edition" which will then download a PDF file of the latest newsletter issue. The portion of particular interest is on pages 74 & 75 [you can go directly there with by hitting the appropriate buttons on your Adobe Acrobat Reader or other PDF viewer].

Seems like its not just an Erie/WSEE problem........

Anonymous said...

if you watched WICU on election night at least you got the right winner!!! JET, WSEE and the TIMES NEWS(online) all reported that Matthew Good had won, WICU reported Horneman.... later everyone else corrected themselves.

Anonymous said...

I think the last anonymous poster is on drugs or something if he thinks ICU got it right election night. It may have been purple and green...or black and white...but not much on 12 election night was right. Ned McGrath is turning over in his grave!

Anonymous said...

anonymous from a few posts ago (Nov.8), do you really tape WSEE newscasts? Why? And for the record, I checked the air-check after I read this, and there was no "F" word at the end of the newscast. Please don't spread even more rumors just to start something.

Anonymous said...

I TiVo all the newscasts. Someone has to police the news! (The Newspaper sure as hell won't)

P.S. I also have 3 TV's turned to all the local network newscasts. (It's good to have money!)

(EDIT)